What would you TAKE AWAY from the world to make it a better place?

Take away our individuality? I would not want to live in such a world, even if it was the most peaceful place in existence. There'd be no need for morals, thought, and especially art, since everything would be static by the singular commune perspective. I don't want to be some fleshy cog in a great single minded machine, more so than I am forced to be now. We are already told to be obedient and be as a team in various places, and a lot of people, do not like that at all. I want to be something more than a sheep with varying levels of fluffy wool, not be cloned into the perspective and life of the others in the flock. It is anathema to those who bear the fire of the free spirit within their chests. It is also, from a human standpoint, unnatural. We were born as we were, flawed but potentially versatile. If we were meant to be ants, I would be carrying a bit of fungus or caramel apple for my brood making queen.

I feel, if we were all of one thought, one motive, and so on, life would be meaningless. We would simply exist then, and from that point, it is not worth being sentient.

On Deiz's comments about pacifism, I can't agree either. It doesn't work, in my opinion. I grew up the most gentle kindly and inoffensive boy I could be, as was the childhood I was given by my mother, school, and media content (seasame street, as an example). I was repaid with physical abuse, misery, and lasting psychological trauma. I tried my damnest not to harm others, because I generally knew they didn't understand/lacked the capacity to care, about what they were doing. But I did not seek for my entire life to be abused by those who would not or could not see what they were doing.

Only when I fought back not with words or unwittingly acting as a target, but with brutality, did I fully assert myself from the violent and cruel spirited peons I was surrounded by. I still hold to this, for I have not escaped them, no matter where I go. However, I also do not seek to become them, or any sort of big dog on the hill. Animals do not believe in pacifism either, since they kill each other for food, territory, irritation, and so on. And yet, they're more in sync with their environment and the world itself. I'm not saying we should climb trees and throw coconuts. Rather, violence is simply innate within life. Something must die or be destroyed, that something else might live.

Violence however, like most any extreme, is bad when there is too much. It is one thing to fend off the local thug. It is another thing to beat one's wife or committ genocide.

I think words are a very appropriate means to first attempt in conflict. But I see no reason not to expand my options with peaceful means fail. I think we should seek peaceful intentions, but not leave ourselves victims to a belief structure when it proves time and time again, impractical (the example in my case, of course). Everyone has the primordial right, and possible impulse, to defend themselves.

By physically fighting back when necessary, I am showing nature's way of expressing to others, 'DO NOT TOUCH'. I find, as confused as many can be with their instincts, things like this tend to awaken quickly.

--------------------

"Flies just tend to have a bad habit of wandering into spiderwebs. The scent of death seems to draw them." -Mouche-