Terrorstorm - a viewer's notes.

Terrorstorm Notes.

Subjects in focus:
() The Iraq War,
() Big Brother,
() 9/11,
() P.R. Wars,
() False Flag Terror
() Proposed invasion of Iran,
() National ID cards,

Larry Silverstein said, of building 7, "pull it" and showed the building collapse at near free-fall speed with a central crimp.

Past false flags:
A) 1933 - The Nazi's burn down the Reichstag, trotting out a mentally disabled man as a culprit for a show trial,
B) 1953 - CIA coup in Iran AKA Operation Ajax,
C) 1964 - Gulf of Tonkin,
D) 1967 - USS Liberty attacked by Israli aircraft,
E) 1946-1983 - NATO's stationing of troops and Operation Gladio.

False Flag:
Covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations which are designed to appear as though they were carried out by other entities.

A)
Event:
Newly elected, Hermann Goring burned the Reichstag, blaming Marinis Vaderlubbe and communisim as confirmed by the documents found at the end of the European phase of WW2.

Benefit to organization:
"Enabling Act" passed (similar to USA PATRIOT Act.)

Additional Act:
Operation Himmler, where a man was taken from a concentration camp, dressed in a Polish army uniform, and shot dead in uniform on the boarder between Poland and Germany to fake the appearance of an attack on a German radio station.

Benefit to organization:
Ability to invade and eventually annex Poland without mass political opposition in Germany.

B)
Event/s:
CIA foments turmoil using terror attacks with British assistance, making it look like the sitting president carried them out. (It's not till the 1990's that Operation Ajax is de-classified, and there's more at www.cia.gov) The operation also included demonstrations, propaganda, creating "agents of influence" false flag attacks, and bribery

Benefit to organization:
Nationalized oil fields privatized, secret police installed.

Additional act/s:
Similar techniques framing communists for similar actions are used in other nations to oust elected governments by both British and US intel.

C)
Event:
The NSA's 2005 de-classification of the incident shows that intel. officers deliberately skewed the reports to show they'd attacked American forces when in fact they'd refused to fire, or return fire.

Benefit to organization:
Gulf of Tonkin Resolution passed, Vietnam War becomes bigger.

D)
Event:
With the planning for major false flag terror events set out in Operation Northwoods, a vessel sent to collect electronic inteligence was 14 miles off the coast of Israel in international waters. The ship was strafed and bombed by unmarked fighter/bombers then torpedoed by ships bearing Israli flags, including using high-calibur machine guns on the life rafts. This is while American signals were being jamed, as opposed to general communications static. When air support wings were radied by the 6th Fleet, the whitehouse, including Secretary of Defense McNammara, order the fleet to stand down. When the admiral escalated it to the President, he said "I want that Goddamn ship going to the bottom. No help. Recall the wings."

Despite the fact that the 6th fleet was stood down, the Israli forces withdrew when there was a Russian spy ship that witnessed the event. The naval officers, including Jagg officers were ordered to falsify reports or stay silent. One of the pilots of the unmarked fighter/bombers also went public saying that they flew three times over the ship refusing to fire as it was flying an American flag, and only did so under threat of court martial.

The events that came to light were as follows:
- President Johnson took personal control of the USS Liberty,
- Stationed it in the international waters of the Mederterranean,
- Mad a deal with Israel to wipe out the crew and the ship,
- He would then blame the attack on Egypt as a pretense to enter the war there.

The Liberty's crew were told they'd spend life in prison or be killed.

G)
Event/s:
Operation Gladio, an unmbrella term for bombings done by Western intel. and NATO itself in Italy, Western Europe, the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. These attacks had the whistle blown years later by former government officials from Italy. The targets included trains, busses, schools, school busses, including the Aug. 2nd 1980 bombing of Bologna, Italy in the railway station. (One the acts that broke the silence of Italy.)

E)
Additional event:
Cubana flight 455 bobmbed with timed detonators. All convicted bombers were offically employed by the US government, and one man who had suspected involvement was directly employed by the CIA.

The rest of the film got corrupted somehow so I'll have to wait till off-peak time to get it again. (That's 2am, so I don't recomend holding your breath.) Still that's just the stuff that was admitted.

As for more modern history, the next example given is the London Tube Bombings on 07.07.2005.

Tony Blair was looking at the next election with trepidation as his phenomenal popularity was slipping, being pro-war and all. Seeming on que, the bombings happened, and he got one more shot with popular support.

Yet the story for THAT begins on the 11th of March, 2004 in Madrid, Spain with the bombings on trains. It was not untill later that these were proven not to be the work of Al Queda. The Spanish Security Service had intimate links to all the bombers, head of the bomb squad included.

The ring leader was connected to the Madrid bomb-squad, and the same modus operandi was used in the London bombings.

The total damage of the London attacks was three trains and a bus, attacked with military-grade explosives. The trains were done symultaniously on three separate trains. For over an hour and a half, Scotland Yard claimed the disruptions were caused by a power outage, despite the handful of minutes was all it took before the surviving witnesses reported in.

50 mins into the attack, the no. 30 bus was diverted from it's normal route to park at the corner of Tavistock square and later is destroyed, by a bomb yet it's the only bus of all the ones in the whole of London that is re-routed by police order. None of the bus stops are used by the no. 30 route.

The supposed bomber on the bus became panicked and for some reason began looking through his rucksack as radio reports started filtering in of the tube bombings. All the bombers, it was said, didn't fit the modus operandi of normal suicide bombers. One was arguing with a ticket clerk about the price of the ticket, the rest buying two-way tickets, some enjoying a game of cricket the day before.

The surviving witnesses said the bombers acted like they didn't know there were bobms in their backpacks. July 29th saw an edition of "Day Side" talked about the so-called mastermind and John Loftus exposed him as a British Inteligence asset. MI6, he said, had been sheilding him from a DOJ investigation for an Oregon terrorist cell. He also managed to get by air to the UK, despite being on a watch list, and it's only when he gets to Pakistan that he gets arrested, only to be let go within 24hrs.

Former MI5 agent David Shayler, famous for taking six months in jail for breaking the official secrets act, claimed that a witness and survivor to the bombings didn't see anyone with a rucksack, and the mtal in the carriage was spiked upward from the floor, indicating there was an explosive device under the carriage, not inside it.

Michael Meacher was ejected from the Blair cabinet at the time of the Iraq War for raising questions about the whole affair. He noted that it was convenient for fear and control over society.

Additionally the shooting of Jean Charles De Menezes saw few witnesses see little more than the police army unit running into the tube station, and most thought there was excessive force used as the reports went from three shots in the head to five, and then eight. Later still it came out that this man never ran from the police and wasn't wearing a heavy coat as reported, and was killed, execution style with more than ten shots straight to the head at point blank range.

An ITN journalist was arrested for getting a police report on the incident. Which was handy due to the police first claiming that there was an outage of the cameras that saw the whole thing, a claim they later had to retract. He had paid for a ticket with an oyster card before getting on the train which was stopped and he was looking at the police, according to eye witnesses as if he was familiar with the people. They then forced him to the ground, squatting on him, and shooting him more than ten times in the head. This was after he'd been followed by the team for thirty minutes.

This action rules out usual bomb encounter techniques, as people wearing explosives are never shot at, as well as being kept out of range. None of this fits with the initial explanation.

Israeli Finance Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was warned prior to the attcks to stay away from a hotel he was going to. This made news in Israel within hours of the bombings. Their prime minister then got a call to his office, advising him not to conduct interviews with the media. The foreign office's spin was that a general warning had been given to the British that day.

The bus survalence camera malfunctioned that day also. Funnily enough, and also handy for the police, the identification cards of the four bombers survived the blast. In one case one of the ID's even appeared at TWO locations.

This implies that not only was there a cover-up, this implies that other intel. agencies had advanced knowledge.

In staged terror attacks, most people involved are compartmentalized and don't know the full picture. This is required as most people are not calus enough to willing take part in a terrorist operation. A good way to smokescreen events is by setting up terrorist drills for the same events at the same time as the real one.

When the Oaklahoma City building was bombed, the ATF was staging a drill that same morning. On September the 11th, the Pentagon was running five drills, all separate. Two of those drills going for the exact same tagets was what helped NORAD to stand down that day. London was the same.

This also helps with organizations like Eschalon and and the NSA that intercept communications and may stop things from happening as planned. In fact on the morning of the London attacks, the same trains and bus were "targeted" in just such an exercise.

Peter Power (Ex Scotland Yard spokesman), head of Visor Consultants informed the world of the drills the morning of the same day. He repeated his story on BBC radio as well.

Using an insurance company actuary, the probability of these exact events coinciding with each other within the space of a ten year mean average of time, the numer is bigger than one in... get ready... three hundred fratigilian. (sp) That's a bigger no. than all the grains of sand on the planet. (You can check my spelling and start here:
http://www.answerbag.com/q_view/34307 )

What that means is you are looking at means as laid out earlier, opportunity, and all that's left is motive. Tony Blair's popularity had nosedived in the lead up to the election, his party was looking, as we said, at losing. After the improval to his approval ratings and support for the war, he landed a raft of laws on people, from looking at restricting access to certain kinds of knives, to hand gun sweeps, as well as attacking the press and freedom of speech in public places. In light of the 2004 Civil Contingencies Act, and the fact that there was a meeting of world leaders in Scotland after the attacks, this sets up a better argument for the British and US stances on war and a few other things. It also stacks that the terror threat was lowered for the G8 summit was was taking place as well.

Pentagon documents show that the nation of Iraq was invaded, not to bring peace and freedom, yet to create endless unrest due to sectarian violence. They knew this would, however, lead to being able to create a permanent base in Iraq. This would also prop up defense contractors and related businesses. (Which could now be there another ten years or so.) Yet there's more to it than that.

In late Sep. 2005 Two British SAS operatives were caught in Basra wearing civilian garb in a car with killed a police officer at a check-point while injuring another. Once they were subdued, their car was found to be full of plastic explosives, RPG's and other bomb-making materials. Why do it though?

The Govenor of Basra ordered the men stand trial for murder, and in a few hours of them being locked up, dozens of tanks and hundreds of soldiers attacked the jail, with guards killed. The media didn't think much of this incident.

Then there's the run-up to the start of the invasion of Iraq. The British govt. leaked "The Whitehouse Memo" which has been authenticated. Bush and Blair had planned out a shoot-down of a plan in Iraq that was painted in U.N. colours. There was also a plan-b that said an Iraqi defector had seen WMD's, despite them not existing. (This is what Mr. Meacher was ejected for.)

Congress, in 2006 looked at repealing the PATRIOT Act, and Bush said that he'd still enforce the law, even if it was repealed. Yet the reason this didn't make much of a splash, and other events of significant import? Bush was caught paying off reporters in secret for news papers and television stations with a total in the pay-outs of $1.6 Billion across two years. His response? He said he was above the law. The British paper The Sunday Telegraph has had people resign over what amounts to bribery, even if it was not with money per-se.

When President Bush was informed that secret arrests, secret detention and torture were against the law, he had Alberto Gonzales issue the famous "torture memo" legalizing them by not calling the measures taken torture. It was no "pressure" and said that a death in custody under "pressure", it was acceptable. Yet it was John Yoo who went further write memo's that were used by military forces that said childrent could be tortured in fornt of their parents, sometimes sexually. Additionally President Bush has signed legislation that has not yet been seen by congress, andordering searces by one of the security agencies. This was because he believed he had executive authority to ignore any law that he wished. The 1878 Posse No Comitatus Act bars an army from being used against the citizens, yet Bush used the defense Inteligence Agency to spy on people in anti-war groups, claiming the Constitution gave him the right to do so. This led to a debate over the term "reasonably believe" being just as valid as "probable cause".

In Iraq, journalists critical of the government are sentanced to an average of thirty years in prison, and in some cases tortured or killed. Though it's come out that not only is the CIA controlling almost all the papers in Iraq, it's got PR firms on retainer to write articles for them, just like they've done for US papers. It turns out millions have been spent in paying off reporters, and planting fake news stories and news stories, in what the CIA calls an infowar. Though this is one directed at their own people. This does explain the reason why so many citizens of the USA have not got a clear picture on world events.

Both Annie Machon and David Shayler were asked to list their opinions as far as the CIA and MI6 links to Al Queda. These first learned of them when they were funded in Lybia to help assasinate Col. Omar Gaddafi. In fact when both blew the whistle there was both jail time and now virtual exile.

Infact, there was a law passed during the documentary's filming that banned freespeech within a certain radius of the British Parliament. (It took affect days after the film crew was there.) This effected a long-time activist Brain Haw, who had, at the time of the filming, been in court five times thanks to the state, and once by his own volition. When the film's producer, Alex Jones, bull-honed parliment, he was enrolled in a potenial terrorist database.

Then there's ID cards and national databases, and there's a push on for their approval. (Including an Australian move to prove either citizenship or permanent residency for jobs.)

Now, this goes back to what constitutes terrorism. The federal government issued guidelines to many states on how to spot and deal with potential terrorists. E.g. Viginia noting property rights activists, and Texas looking out for people wearing Levi jeans, using pre-paid cell phones, and avoiding confrontations by presenting a "nice-guy" image, and if your in Arizona and you make frequent referances to the US Constitution, you might get on a watch list. There's also the US federal government police warning to keep an eye out for road almanacs in the hands of drivers.

World wide, there has been a crack down on free speech, especialy in the establishment of free-speech zones in America. In fact monitoring people's behaviour is so bad in London that there's four million cameras observing public areas. Some people just say they never noticed them. The producer said there was Orwellian double-think going on with people saying people should give up liberty for freedon. Ray McGovern weighed in when the filming began in Crawford, Texas. As a CIA analyst for some 27 years, he retired during the administration of George W. Bush when he felt they no longer wanted an honest appraisal of intel. data. He said that the oil and the military bases were the cheif goal of the US Govt. being there, though he found it hard to deal with people who didn't see the bigger picture.

Protesters like Cindy Sheehan were eventually kicked off the land around President George Bush's ranch, and that was the pro-bush and pro-war protesters as well as the anti-war protesters.

The Project for a New American Century was a think tank, and there was a document it produced titled Rebuilding America's Defences, wherein it argues that:
"Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbour."
Dick Cheny helped wright this document before September the 11th, 2001.

This leads to the fairly-well-known questions about that day and why there were drills and money being sent from Pakistani Inteligence (The ISI) to the supposed hijacking master mind. In fact the list of people that've used their relative clout in whatever fields they were in to ask questions, include:
- Paul Craig Roberts, (Ex assistant to the US Treasury)
- Steven Jones (EYU physics professor)
- Andreas Von Buelow (Former German Defence Minister)
- Dr. Morgan Reynolds (Ex Cheif Economist Dept. of Labour)

That's on top of the people allready mentioned, and I'm not including people who are film and music stars. (On a personal note, if you, want to learn more about the attacks on 9/11 I think that a separate thread, however I will summarize.)

- Liquid metal in the rubble and flowing down the sides of the WTC 1 and 2,
- WTC 7 was not hit by a plane,
- All structures in NYC collapsed at free-fall speeds,
- Financial put options on companies shares effected by the day's events,
- Some of the alleged hijackers turning up alive,
- Any number of physics problems with the official story,

When a prominant actor, Charlie Sheen, went public about his doubts about the events, he was attacked by the press, even after he preempted that by challenging the media to debate him on the facts that he had questions about. In fact the only remotely fair media play that he got was on Showbiz Tonight. They had Alex Jones on the same show later who quoted a CNN poll asking: Do you think the government had a hand in covering up the events on 9/11? 90% said yes.
When Showbiz Tonight asked: Do you agree there is a government cover-up of 9/11, the split between yes and no was eighty two percent and eighteen percent respectively.

The lack of coverage on WTC 7 as opposed to the limited information on the Pentagon and the slim justification national security affords that, may explain why they attack everything else so harshly. (Wasn't on of the first posts in debate on the idea of a New World Order that mentione foil hats?)

Edward Bernays, the father of PR to some, pioneered public persuasion. He wrote the book Propaganda wherein you find him asking:
"If we understand the mechanism and motives of the group mind, is it not possible to control and regiment the masses according to our will without their knowing about it?" (Page 71.)

He also added on the same page:
"The conscious and inteligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our government. We are governed, our minds molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of."

His clients included:
- Proctor and Gamble,
- CBS,
- united Fruit Company,
- American Tobacco Co.,
- General Electric,
- Dodge Motors,
- The US Army, and,
- More than one President of the USA.

He also spearheaded the American national campaign for fluordation of water with like minded people in the Public health service. His public admirers included Nazi Minister of Propaganda Joseph Goebbels.

Human history has been a struggle of people fighting against bullies and organized crime, yet today there is not a threat of outright force, it's a system of manipulation and intimidaton that sees us intimidating ourselves. We belive that the establishment is our loving keeper, not a parasite. These people are threatened by the freedom and indipendance that humanity displays, because they will seek to control us and everything in the world. He then finishes with a famous quote:
"In a world of universal deceit, telling the truth is revolutionary"

()()()

That's the whole lot of that,
Forrest.